Answer:
Beta = 0.62
Explanation:
<em>The capital pricing model establishes the relationship between expected return from a stock and its systematic risk . The systematic risk is that which affects all players (businesses and firms) in the entire market, such risks are occassioned by changes in interest rate, exchange rate e.t.c</em>
<em>According to the model , the expected return is computed as follows</em>
E(r) = Rf + β(Rm-Rf)
Rf- risk -free rate, Rm-Rf - market premium
E(r) = 12.2%, Rm-Rf = 10, β- ?
12.2 = 6% + β× 10
10β = 12.2 -6
β= (12.2-6)/10
= 0.62
Answer:
b. Consolidate all credit cards onto a single card with a single interest rate.
Explanation:
When a debt payment plan is initiated then, it is decided according to the outstanding amounts, that which shall be paid first and the order of payment for remaining debts.
For this monthly income and expenses are to be evaluated, in order to decide how much payment shall be made accordingly, in each month.
But this entire process do not involve the step of aggregating all the cards so that there is only one card with the same payment. There is no relation to any such payment.
Answer: A.There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of $299,500
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that according to the Federal Housing Finance Board, the mean price of a single-family home two years ago was $299,500 and that a real estate broker believes that due to recent credit crunch, the mean price has increased since then and the result is that the null hypothesis is not rejected.
The conclusion based on the results of the test is that since the null hypothesis has been rejected, it simply means that there are sufficient evidence that there has been an increase in the mean price since two years ago.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
Efficiency variance =$9,860
unfavorable
Explanation:
Labour efficiency variance is the difference between the actual time taken to achieve a given production output less the standard hours allowed for same multiplied by the standard labour rate
Hours
11,900 units should have take (11,900× 4hrs) 47,600
but did take <u>48,180</u>
Difference 580 unfavorable
Standard hours <u> × $17 </u>
Efficiency variance <u>$9,860
unfavorable</u>
