Answer:
Correct answer is They were weak and sometimes dishonest.
Explanation:
First option is correct as the Roman Empire, especially western part was very unstable. That was additionally upheld by the fact that most of them since the division of Empire in 395 had no authority and brought many wrong decision.
Second option is not correct as we cannot say that they were popular at all.
Third option is not correct, as one of the ways how we were able to see their incompetence was through the fact that they practically made no reform.
Last option is also not correct as people weren't directly choosing them.
The statement about the cases such as Lochner v. New York (1905) and Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) is: False.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Supreme Court Ruling?</h3>
The ruling by the Supreme court in both cases gave more rights to the individuals involved than the federal or state government.
In the Lochner v. New York (1905) case, the supreme court ruled that it was unlawful for the New York State Law to set the maximum working hours for bakers because it violated their rights.
In the second case, the court ruled against a federal law that promoted child labor.
Learn more about the principle of self-government here:
brainly.com/question/6347343
Answer:
b. Personal Consumption Expenditure
Explanation:
<u>The Personal Consumption Expenditure is a way to measure how much money an American person spends in goods and services at a national level.</u>
It divides in two categories, Goods and Services.
Goods: it divides in two sub-categories, these are durable goods which are long-lasting items, such as cars and washing machines and non-durable goods which are items that households use quickly, like groceries and clothing.
Services: These are the functions that businesses provide, so the households don't have to do it, for example, dry cleaners, yard maintenance, and financial services.
