1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ASHA 777 [7]
3 years ago
7

Plz help me I need help​

English
1 answer:
olya-2409 [2.1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

when did Santuram buy that skateboard?

You might be interested in
(52 points)
igomit [66]

Answer:

Graffiti should be considered a crime. If someone calls vandalizing other peoples property art, then that person is wrong. Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own , most of the time graffiti is disrespectful, and it is very costly to the community.

       Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own. If someone was to vandalize another persons home with graffiti written on it, that person would feel very disrespected. Although sometimes graffiti is beautiful, we would not want a person to vandalize our property and have them call it art. It would be fine if a graffiti artist were to draw on their own property because it belongs to them. It is very disrespectful for someone to draw on someone else's property without permission. Which brings me to my second point.

         Most of the time graffiti is disrespectful. The artist have no concern on what they draw that might offend other people who have the chance to see it.  Graffiti artist are truly gifted, so this means they can make their art look very realistic. Someone might say, if someone does not want to see it then they should not look. Whoever might say that is very wrong. Graffiti artist tend to draw art on almost anything that they can. This means they draw it for the public to see, whether the public wishes to see it or not. Some graffiti artist do not care what they write, but parents do. A parents does not want to walk with their child somewhere crowded, and see something inappropriate drawn or written for their child to see. Which brings me to my third and final point.

         Graffiti is very costly to the community to get it removed. That is why graffiti artist should not draw offensive things, but they do anyway and the community has to pay to get it removed. This is just like the app Instagram. If someone were to post something offensive towards the public, someone would report it, so it could get removed because what they saw were either offensive to them, their children, or they were thinking about everyone else that might come across that post. This relates to graffiti. If the community were to leave something that were offensive to the community there would be problems, not small problems, but big enough problems that could get people hurt.

         Although graffiti is a wonderful thing to see, it should be called a crime because it can corrupt young minds and cause problems.

   

Explanation:

Sorry if this is not what you were looking for!

7 0
3 years ago
In the book sounder, Armstrong says: “Each bark bounced from slope to slope in the foothills like a rubber ball.” What does the
jeyben [28]

Answer:

Sounder tells the story of an African American boy, his family, and their beloved coonhound. As in author William H. Armstrong's book, none of the main charac- ters has a name-except the dog, Sounder.

" 'Sounder and me must be about the same age,' the boy said, tugging gently at one of the coon dog's ears, and then the other," the book tells us as it introduces this canine who is named for his bark that resonates across the countryside when he trees a raccoon or opossum.

Sounder is not a true story, but it is an accurate piece of historical fiction about a black sharecropper's family in the southern area of the United...

The boy hears his father may be in Bartow and later Gilmer counties, but the author does not specify where the boy lives. Sounder won the Newbery Award in 1970 and was made into a major motion picture in 1972.

ExplPatterned after a story told to Armstrong by an older school-teacher, the novel is concerned, in part, with the family's loyal coon dog named Sounder—named for his resonant howl that reverberates across the country-side—whose fate in many ways parallels the life of the narrator's unjustly treated father.

6 0
2 years ago
Choose the answer that best completes the sentence below.
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

The Answer is A, namely

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Larissa, who actually knowns what happened to people once they are released?​
timofeeve [1]
According to the war of 1987 the French and Indian war of Allah blah
5 0
3 years ago
In the passage the least Weasley which transition is used to induduce an example
svet-max [94.6K]
Are there any choices for this question?

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • compare the tone or attitude of the author toward his subject in each work, citing details to show how it is convey. Explain how
    12·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    10·2 answers
  • The play I Remember Mama is ___ of life in San Francisco at the turn of the century. A. contiguous B. provocative C. redolent D.
    9·2 answers
  • “ at the circus you always hear the calliope.” What part of speech is always?
    5·1 answer
  • The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
    8·1 answer
  • in an argument, a claim is an author's position on an issue. What claim does jefferson make in the first paragraph, and how does
    7·1 answer
  • Which detail from the passage shows that James Cross Giblin agrees with de Guignes's view of cartouches?
    6·2 answers
  • Gothic was a term originally applied to works that people thought to be what?
    12·1 answer
  • Show
    10·1 answer
  • 10 about twenty books.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!