All categories

3 years ago

Read this scenario:

English

1 answer:

astraxan [27]3 years ago

3 0

The fox likely represents a negative cultural value known as materialism

You might be interested in

I WILL MARK BRAINLEST

sveticcg [70]

Answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court expanded voting rights through Voting Rights Act interpretation. sorry if its late

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

House is to _ as bus is to mobile

zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

building I believe

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

A day was twenty-four hours long but seemed longer. There was no hurry, for there was nowhere to go, nothing to buy and no money

guapka [62]

Answer:

Parallelism

Explanation:

The given excerpt is an example of parallelism.

Parallelism (also known as parallel structure or parallel construction) is a figure of speech in which phrases in a sentence are grammatically the same or similar in construction, sound, meaning, or meter. The purpose of parallelism is to give balance, clarity, pattern, or rhythm.

In the second sentence of the excerpt, we have several repetitions:

There was no hurry, for there was nowhere to go. (there + past simple tense + negation)
... nowhere to go, nothing to buy and no money to buy it with, nothing to see outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (negation + infinitive)
... nothing to buy and no money to buy it with, nothing to see outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (a part of the repetition I previously pointed out - nothing + infinitive).

6 0

3 years ago

I have trouble believing Mr. Sawicki's characterization of Steve, because he knows Steve only in school. Since Mr. Sawicki does

dedylja [7]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

I have trouble believing Mr. Sawicki's characterization of Steve, because he knows Steve only in school. Since Mr. Sawicki does not know Steve outside of school, he cannot make a judgment about what Steve has been doing in his neighborhood or who his friends are. Sawicki says Steve is honest, but even if Steve is good or honest in Mr. Sawicki's opinion, good people can still make mistakes.

What did you consider when you were writing your answer? Check all that apply.

what Mr. Sawicki says . what other people say . whether Steve is guilty or innocent . what Steve has said

Answer:

what Mr. Sawicki says

Explanation:

The answer shown in the text above was created considering only what Mr. Sawicki says about Steve. The answer states that Steve's characterization through what Mr. Sawicki says is not reliable. That's because Mr. Sawicki doesn't know Steve fully and only knows his behavior in one place, at school. Mr. Sawicki does not know anything about Steve and does not even know how he behaves outside of school, so he cannot say that Steve is honest. In other words, Mr. Sawicki's speech is imprecise, it lacks evidence and therefore cannot be trusted.

7 0

3 years ago

Which is the following would be a clue word indicating a contrast?

hichkok12 [17]

Your answer would be neither

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers