Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
Answer:
answer is C: she admires and respect his contribution as a veteran I took the test as well ;p;
person above why you say no? :T
The faulty logic in this sentence is an example of an either-or-fallacy. Given the construction of this type of fallacy it posits that the potential outcomes of a situation are usually a singular event such as in this example the only result is a prolonged strike and it will be economically crippling, this may happen but a variety of options could happen as well.
Answer:
You ask how you can distinguish the awareness of friend and the awareness of foe, say that you are planning to analyze soldiers’ awareness of friend and foe, and that you can't find research that defines or distinguish between awareness of friend and awareness of toe.
You could use definition or root word to better understand the word or to learn what it means.
