Here's what he must do:
-- Run the experiment again, several times if possible. Combine or
analyze
the results of the several experimental runs in some statistically
valid way.
-- Run the simulation again, several times. Combine or analyze the results
of the several simulations in some statistically valid way.
-- Then, compare the analysis of several experimental runs with the analysis
of several simulations, in some statistically valid way, to decide whether they
<em>really</em> don't track.
-- If they do, then look for ways to tighten up the simulation so that maybe
they can track better.
-- If they don't, then he's back to <em>before</em> Square-1. He not only has to
deal with the question of whether or not his experiment is valid, but he
also has to consider the possibility that his simulation is trash and
doesn't actually model nature like he expected it to.
Perhaps it is scientific inquiry?
Hope this helped! Have a great day!
In order to actually start up the Scientific method you must "Observe" whatever it is you want to question.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
An illustration of epigenetic change is a microbe, which can stimulate modifications in the host DNA, causing suppression of defenses or weakening of individual cells. Epigenetic changes modify the physical composition of DNA.
One of the examples of epigenetic change is DNA methylation. DNA methylation refers to the supplementation of methyl group, which inhibits some of the genes from getting expressed. One of the conditions of DNA methylation is cancer.
In the majority of cancer, the tumor cells go through global hypomethylation. The tumor suppressed genes seem to turn highly methylated in the conditions of cancer.
