Answer:
Because there is a wide user base and questions are answered in a small matter of time
If this one is wrong sorry ill try to fix it
This great tradition began to erode with the advent of broadcast news. Radio had a great golden age but TV was pretty quick to abandon research and professionalism for the quick and the exciting. Corporate ownership between 1990–2000 ki-led newspapers, with their Yale MBA bottom line thinking. I managed a newspaper that made a 40 percent profit but all they could think to do was cut and downsize. I could document this if you like, but that’s not really the question. I know of one newspaper worth $76 million (sale price) in 1990 and it was worth $18 million in 2001 (sale price). This was due entirely to the mismanagement of Donrey and Media News. The internet was not even present for half the decade and irrelevant in the other half.
Answer:
I would stick to non gmos because gmos have pesticides and other very harmful chemicals in it.
Explanation:
Answer:
No; Warren weakens her point by claiming that the Paycheck Fairness Act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." No; Warren weakens her point by noting, "Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes." Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women."
Explanation:
In addition to the aforementioned answer, the rhetoric that women make less simply because of discrimination, is factually inaccurate and is not supported by any data. In fact the difference in income is always drawn back to the job choices that women choose. Women are more art/literature bound for jobs whereas men choose higher paying jobs such as STEM, engineering, etc...
