The corruption within the communist Chinese government, lack of freedom of speech, press, and restriction on political participation. Inflation and the democratic movement in Eastern Europe are triggers of the incident.
The US government had imposed tariff policies that set a higher price on imported (foreign) manufactured goods. Because the South was an agricultural economy, it either had to ship down form the North or import from other countries most of the finished goods it consumed. Either option increased the cost of goods for Southerners over the prices paid by Northerners. Because the North was a largely industrial economy, and because raw materials imported for manufacturing were not subject to tariffs, the North faced no such burden. Additionally, because there was no income tax at this time, federal gov't revenue depended largely on tariff revenue -- which meant it was paid disproportionately by the South. This revenue was spent on railroads in the North and in other ways that unfairly benefitted the North while largely ignoring infrastructure and development in the South. South Carolina threatened secession as far back as 1828 over the unfair burden of the protective tariffs.
Answer:Obviously refers to the July 1932 eviction from Washington DC of unarmed US war veteran protesters and their families some 7000-15000 people who had come to protest their unemployment/ homelessness/ starvation and the non payment of their WWI veteran pay to the US government during the Great Depression.
After some violence had broken out the night of July 28th (the Washington police chief was injured and 2 protesters killed by police). The then President (Herbert Hoover) sent in army troops led by General Douglas MacArthur. Against the orders of the President to act with 'restraint' MacArthur attacked the protesters at night with cavalry, sabers, rifle fire, machine guns, and tanks, killing/ wounding 100+, then burned their tents to the ground despite the efforts of the Washington police chief and officers to protect the unarmed crowd.
Explanation:
Answer:
There are several reasons why we might oppose to the annexation of Hawaii by the United States government. Some of this could be:
The fact that all people and nations have the right to govern themselves. Hawaiians deserve to make their own decisions.
The deposition of Queen Liliuokalani was forceful, and did not follow democratic or legal procedures.
A treaty of friendship, as existed originally, already gives the United States many privileges in terms of trade.
The economy of Hawaii was already very integrated to that of the United States.
A new state in the country represents a significant expense for the federal government.
