1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anyanavicka [17]
3 years ago
11

How did roads contribute to the empires sucsess?

History
1 answer:
Taya2010 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Roman introduced the stone-paved roads. Their purpose was military. They made the movement of troops and the transport of supplies to soldiers at the front or in garrisons fastest and easier. Therefore, they were important for the defense of the empire. They also made communication and the transport of goods for trade quicker and easier.  The paved roads were only 20% of the 400,000 kilometers (250,000 miles) of roads in the Roman Empire. They were the backbone of the overland communication and trade of the empire. The success of the empire was not only a military one. It was also a commercial one. The empire formed a huge trading network where large quantities of goods were bought, sold and transported all around the empire, creating prosperity

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What happened in the 1680s that created conflict between Britain and the American colonies?
miss Akunina [59]
When Britain started implementing stricter measures on their colonies' trade and other affairs, the colonies didn't like it. 
8 0
4 years ago
All of the following can directly influence the way Americans swing politically EXCEPT?
saveliy_v [14]

I believe the answer is A, citizeship

8 0
4 years ago
Which Native American group was the first to build permanent settlements?
maw [93]
I think it’s the Eastern Woodlands tribe.
3 0
3 years ago
Simple question.......
ExtremeBDS [4]

I think it's Lake Assad or Al Jaboul Lake. I'm not very sure so don't use this answer on anything important.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the role of religion differ between feudal Japan and feudal Europe
uysha [10]
<span>That's an interesting question. Feudal Japan had a more formalized and ritualized kind of culture than feudal Europe did; elaborate rules of courtesy applied at all levels of society, whereas European peasants were pretty crude for the most part. In both societies there was a unifying religious principle, which in Europe was Christianity and the authority of the Church, and in Japan was shintoism and the authority of the Emperor. In both cases, a social hierarchy attempted, with considerable success, to control everyone's lives; everyone owed their fealty to someone, except for the kings in Europe or the Emperor in Japan, who didn't owe loyalty to anyone, since there was no higher authority (at least, not counting deities). Both societies had similar types of weaponry (European armor was considerably tougher) and skilled swordsmen were much to be feared and respected. In the lower classes, life was cheap. Neither society had any concept of human rights; only the nobility had rights.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Supreme Court deem two policies of the First New Deal unconstitutional?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain why black leaders were under more pressure to work together than white politicians were.
    5·1 answer
  • CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS I WILL GIVE 22 POINT AND MARK YOU AS A Brainliest
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following has the fewest number of electoral votes?
    13·2 answers
  • Which were the three parts of the new Roman republic?
    15·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP!
    15·2 answers
  • Who spoke against British rule in colonial times?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the first step of the naturalization process of becoming a citizen?
    8·2 answers
  • Please help me I would appreciate it
    8·2 answers
  • Jelaskan kepentingan mrnghargai kebijaksanaan pemimpin dalam mentadbir negara.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!