Churchill had a claim that could have prevented Germany from taking the Sudetenland, and this claim was:
- They could have joined forces with France so that they could be safer.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
A claim is an assertion that something is a case and typically with no evidence or proof to back it up.
In Churchill's claim, he offered NO evidence for it.
Read more about <em>Germany</em> here:
brainly.com/question/24909197
Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
Weaknesses of Articles
- The government had no power to pass taxes
- The government could not regulate trade
- 9 of 13 states had to approve any charges of the government
- There was no executive branch to enforce the laws
- The states had more power than the national government
Because he claimed to know a better route to asia.
hope this helps:)
I think you want to know whether the statement in question is true or false. Based on this assumption, i am answering the question. It is true that President George W. Bush's actions in sending American troops to Afghanistan and Iraq illustrated the president's constitutional power. I hope the answer helps.
The first step was the development of Anaconda plan, which aims to set up a naval blockade of the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, and to transport around 60,000 Union troops. This will enable them to cut off all trade and they can put hold to all forts and town along the way. However, the plan was rejected and was never put into action due to it being passive and slow to implement. With the aim to end the war quickly, Anaconda plan was revisited as a 3rd step. Wherein they employ the general framework of the plant but added combat to play on the screen. The general idea of the plan still contributes to put an end of the Civil War.
