Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
Answer:
the answer is option c
Explanation:
plz mark me as brainlest answer
Three linguistic vices that can be used are:
<h3>What is a linguistic vice?</h3>
Language vices are constructions or uses of incorrect terminology that might impede the accurate understanding of a message.
Because it comprises all of the elements that disrupt the regular flow of communication, it involves both diction and vocabulary.
Examples are:
Cacophony:
This refers to an unpleasant combination of sounds. Examples:
- The cars drove past the busy street honking horns and screeching brakes;
- Students were talking and motorbikes running;
Idiotism:
This refers to breaking the rules of normal grammar. Examples:
"Very very abnormal mental dementation!"
"She loves it very much"
Learn more about literary vices at;
brainly.com/question/2183813
#SPJ1
What is this mean I don’t understand the question
A man wandering near a flowing river started a miser weep
