1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
3 years ago
5

Do you think the U.S. should have pulled out of Afghanistan? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
valkas [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Considering that they should never have gone in in the first place, it's about time that they pulled out. I saw a cartoon the other day of an Afghan standing beside the road looking at all the head gear of those trying to conquer the region -- Rome, Russia, one more I can't remember and  The US. It's quite a list. History should have told America to stay out.

If Russia couldn't do it, (and she's much closer to Afghanistan than America is) then it should have been a warning not to try.

You might be interested in
what mistake did Christopher Columbus make that led him to believe he could make it to Asia by sailing West
mr_godi [17]

He miscalculated the size of the Earth by more than half.

3 0
3 years ago
Who was the Assistant Director of the FBI who wrote a letter to Sen. John P. East (R-NC. describing King's conduct of "orgiastic
Natasha_Volkova [10]
It was "Charles D. Brennan" who was the Assistant Director of the FBI who wrote a letter to Sen. John P. East (R-NC. describing King's conduct of "orgiastic and adulterous escapades, <span>some of which indicated that King could be bestial in his sexual abuse of women," since he wanted to use this information to discredit King and his campaigns. </span><span>
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
True or False: There have always been two main political parties in the United States.
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

That is true!

Hope this helped! :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the international slave trade?
torisob [31]
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves.  Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.

This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves. 

However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery.  Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.

Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
7 0
3 years ago
Why is donald duck so popular in scandinavia?
Nady [450]
Because he's a talking duck. JK, it's literally because Mickey Mouse seemed too perfect, meanwhile Donald is not.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Zheng He make his voyages? to spread new crops outside of China to collect tributes and learn about new places to discou
    12·2 answers
  • What ethical issues did humanists struggle with during the italian renaissance?
    13·1 answer
  • French explorer who traveled south along the Mississippi river to the gulf of Mexico naming the region Louisiana is honor of Kin
    12·1 answer
  • What is the term of office for a federal judge
    8·2 answers
  • Which term best completes the diagram?
    12·1 answer
  • 3. In what ways did the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s improve conditions for
    13·1 answer
  • Empiricism is the belief that knowledge can only be obtained through experience and use of the five senses. It became a popular
    15·1 answer
  • Please help❤️❤️❤️
    14·1 answer
  • Please help for brainlist :))
    8·2 answers
  • Kinsa nga kabalo mag bisaya diha :))<br><br>Find some Friends :)​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!