1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
3 years ago
5

Recent work by taphonomists on sites and remains associated with Homo erectus has led them to question Group of answer choices W

hether Homo erectus hunters killed the animals whose bones have been found together with Acheulean tools Whether Homo erectus used fire to cook the meat of the animals whose bones have been found in association with Homo erectus remains Whether Homo erectus practiced cannibalism All are correct
History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
5 0

Answers below, one by one

Explanation:

1. Homo erectus hunters killed the animals whose bones have been found together with Acheulean tools

<em>Acheulean</em> tools are 'hand axes', a tool made of stone which main feature is an oval or a 'peared 'shape. These have been associated to <em>Homo erectus </em>and derived species, such as <em>Homo heidelbergensis.          </em>

Such technology was created and used during the Lower Palaeolithic era, geographically found in Africa, a wide parte of West Asia, South Asia, East Asia and Europe, and come typically together with <em>Homo erectus</em> remains. It is thought that <em>Acheulean</em> technologies derived from a previous kind of technology called <em>Oldowan</em>, which has been associated to <em>Homo habilis. </em>

Let's keep in mind that usually the technology that characterized a period would be the kind of tool that might have been used  mostly by that group. Therefore, if we put all the information together, it would be easy to deduct that animal bones found together with <em>Homo erectus</em> remains and tools could come from a hunted one. However, we should also keep in mind that there exists a possibility on this, but not necessarily all the remains found together mean the animals were killed by that subject, since there is a chance that animals and humans with their tools were buried together as a part of a death ritual.

<em />

2. Homo erectus used fire to cook the meat of the animals whose bones have been found in association with Homo erectus remains

Hearths are campfires that have been found as evidence, and the earliest ones belong to <em>Homo erectus</em> period. In the hearths, evidence shows that these were used for cooking and maybe sharing food. It would be pretty logical to think that bones found in association with <em>Homo erectus </em>remains could have been from the animals they might have cooked and consumed. If this was correct, also hearths or campfires could have been places where social interaction, warmth and large predators defence may have happenned.

3. Homo erectus practiced cannibalism

The first reason that comes to mind to explain prehistoric cannibalism is dietary motivations - since probably these species were opportunists to eat, as a part of daily survival.

Despite this could be the most popular idea, we still should consider that social motivations (meaning social interaction and complexity in them) could have played an important role in why acts of cannibalism took place. This means  there cannot have been a single reason; it is believed that human flesh provides a poor calorific return.

You might be interested in
What changed the lives of the men and women in the book of Acts?
masha68 [24]

answer: Same stuck

Explanation:

I'm stuck on this to lol I need help..

5 0
3 years ago
the colonists that agreed with patrick henry were best described as a. patriots b. loyalists c. federalists or d. anti-federalis
inessss [21]

Answer:

A. Patriots

Explanation:

Patrick Henry urged Americans to revolt against the British and take up arms against the soldiers. He was most famous for his declaration to the Second Virginia Convention: "Give me liberty, or give me death!

8 0
3 years ago
How did Hitler’s rule in Nazi Germany exemplify totalitarian rule?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]
Hitler gave himself absolute powers through constitutional amendments that enabled him to do whatever he wished as the only leader.
 These totalitarian powers were expressed in terms of censuring the media, control of information through propaganda tactics,use of the secret police,and detention camps. Germany under Hitler is an example of a totalitarian nation where the public would dare question those in authority.
5 0
3 years ago
What are three characteristics of the Lapita people that enabled them to migrate to islands throughout Oceania?
julsineya [31]
.<span> They were master sailors. </span>2. They were great boat builders. <span>3. They had a good u</span><span>nderstanding of the stars navigate.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the new mass media contribute to the popularity of heroes?
inysia [295]
<span>New broad communications are the methods for conveying that achieve bigger no. of individuals in a brief timeframe. eg. Radio, daily papers. Utilizing new broad communications, individuals like Charles Lindsberg got prevalent, on the grounds that broad communications spread the data about individuals rapidly.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • describe connections between the Declaration of Independence and the first principle, popular sovereignty. Be sure to include a
    5·2 answers
  • what is the universal sign for choking? in addition to the universal sign for choking, there are some other signs that indicate
    7·1 answer
  • What impact did the appeasement policy of the United States, Britain, and France have i. German aggression
    14·2 answers
  • After World War II, what impact did the Convention People's Party have in
    8·1 answer
  • Do any one know anything I have lots of points to give please help me with these answers I all of them
    15·1 answer
  • "[The registrar] brought a big old book out there, and he gave me the sixteenth section of the constitution of Mississippi, . .
    9·1 answer
  • Was the United States better off in 1920 than in 1898 as a result of this involvement in
    14·1 answer
  • 14. Which statement is most consistent with the views of Samuel Adams and the Sons<br> of Liberty?
    13·1 answer
  • I need help! it’s due tomorrow morning!!
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Rhode Island become a haven for people of various religious faiths?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!