1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
3 years ago
5

Recent work by taphonomists on sites and remains associated with Homo erectus has led them to question Group of answer choices W

hether Homo erectus hunters killed the animals whose bones have been found together with Acheulean tools Whether Homo erectus used fire to cook the meat of the animals whose bones have been found in association with Homo erectus remains Whether Homo erectus practiced cannibalism All are correct
History
1 answer:
mash [69]3 years ago
5 0

Answers below, one by one

Explanation:

1. Homo erectus hunters killed the animals whose bones have been found together with Acheulean tools

<em>Acheulean</em> tools are 'hand axes', a tool made of stone which main feature is an oval or a 'peared 'shape. These have been associated to <em>Homo erectus </em>and derived species, such as <em>Homo heidelbergensis.          </em>

Such technology was created and used during the Lower Palaeolithic era, geographically found in Africa, a wide parte of West Asia, South Asia, East Asia and Europe, and come typically together with <em>Homo erectus</em> remains. It is thought that <em>Acheulean</em> technologies derived from a previous kind of technology called <em>Oldowan</em>, which has been associated to <em>Homo habilis. </em>

Let's keep in mind that usually the technology that characterized a period would be the kind of tool that might have been used  mostly by that group. Therefore, if we put all the information together, it would be easy to deduct that animal bones found together with <em>Homo erectus</em> remains and tools could come from a hunted one. However, we should also keep in mind that there exists a possibility on this, but not necessarily all the remains found together mean the animals were killed by that subject, since there is a chance that animals and humans with their tools were buried together as a part of a death ritual.

<em />

2. Homo erectus used fire to cook the meat of the animals whose bones have been found in association with Homo erectus remains

Hearths are campfires that have been found as evidence, and the earliest ones belong to <em>Homo erectus</em> period. In the hearths, evidence shows that these were used for cooking and maybe sharing food. It would be pretty logical to think that bones found in association with <em>Homo erectus </em>remains could have been from the animals they might have cooked and consumed. If this was correct, also hearths or campfires could have been places where social interaction, warmth and large predators defence may have happenned.

3. Homo erectus practiced cannibalism

The first reason that comes to mind to explain prehistoric cannibalism is dietary motivations - since probably these species were opportunists to eat, as a part of daily survival.

Despite this could be the most popular idea, we still should consider that social motivations (meaning social interaction and complexity in them) could have played an important role in why acts of cannibalism took place. This means  there cannot have been a single reason; it is believed that human flesh provides a poor calorific return.

You might be interested in
How did the us gain Hawaii
pickupchik [31]
In the year of 1893, there was a group of sugar planters and expatriates supported by a division of the us. Marines deposed Queen Liliuokalani, the last reigning monarch of Hawaii. One year later, the Republic of Hawaii was established as a us protectorate with Hawaiian-born Sanford B Dole as president.
8 0
3 years ago
5. Explain how atolls are formed?
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

The central lagoons of atolls are formed by coral growth and volcanic activity.

Hope this helps

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
If the german people wanted to unite their nations, they should be able to do that? Why or why not? Use evidence from the treat
diamong [38]

Answer:

They would not be able to do that

Explanation:

The unification of German people had been an issue of contention for many years. This was not without war and bloodshed. At that time, in 1801, there was Prussia which was at the leadership of Otto von Bismarck. He embarked on a series of wars that pushed the unification of the Arian people of the German speaking people. However, there was a war which was known as the Franco-Prussian War. This eventually led to the world war 2 as there was an eventual force of the annexation of a German territory.

5 0
4 years ago
What qualities did the leaders of the second-wave empires share in common?
Eva8 [605]
The empires that the leaders of the Second Wabe were to rule were much larger than those of the First Wave. The colonies and people were governed from a distance, and <span>leaders </span>achieved the expansion of their empires through wars of conquest. The <span>leaders</span><span> had more military power, over the old divine power, because they were in command of well-organized armies and fleets of ships to dominate. Instead of seeing themselves as divinities, the rulers of the Second Wabe were politicians, who allowed assemblies and the intervention of the people, like the Greeks. The new rulers were through politics, the creation of laws, new concepts such as citizenship in Rome and Greece, as well as the possibility of not governing for life, but elect leaders, as with the Roman Consuls.</span>



5 0
3 years ago
Read the passage. Which sentence from the text best expresses the author's opinion of the Seneca Falls Convention? "The Seneca F
Colt1911 [192]
Sorry if wrong, I think it is   "The Seneca Falls Convention was the first conference dedicated to women's rights." OR it could be "<span>The Seneca Falls Convention of 1848 was the single-most important event of the early women's suffrage movement."</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • +25 Points
    15·2 answers
  • The Specie Circular: a. stabilized the economy for the rest of the 1830s b. required gold or silver payment for public lands c.
    11·2 answers
  • 1.In your opinion, was the use of atomic weapons justified under the circumstances?
    11·1 answer
  • A supporter of the Bolsheviks would most likely agree with which statement?
    7·2 answers
  • Yes, Bill, nothing will save us but an entire stopping of trade, to both England and the West Indies, throughout the continent,
    13·1 answer
  • Who were the first Europeans to come to Argentina
    13·1 answer
  • What was one benefit of the Allied forces’ taking control of North Africa?
    13·1 answer
  • According to Washington, what is the ultimate cause of political factionalism? Why does Washington believe that factionalism is
    8·2 answers
  • 4 Which of the following countries has
    12·1 answer
  • What is attributed with pulling nations like the US, Japan and Germany out of the
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!