Answer:
More information kkmbhhhhhhu
Sing = singing (present-tense) + sang (past-tense)
Yell = yelling (present-tense) + yelled (past-tense)
Lace = lacing (present-tense) + laced (past-tense)
Talk = talking (present-tense) + talked (past-tense)
Slice = slicing (present-tense) + sliced (past-tense)
Dance = Dancing (present-tense) + Danced (past-tense)
Answer:
No, legislation on wiretapping is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment and Orwell's vision of Big Brother.
Explanation:
Technically, Wiretapping acts would not infringe the Fourth Amendment as wiretapping is not regarded as search and seizure, which would entail a physical search of the property and belongings of an individual. Moreover, it established your Fourth Amendment rights extend only to one's physical property and not to communications or other non-tangible items, and because the people involved are not forced to reveal incriminating details.
However, the interference of NSA in the privacy of people which is mentioned in Orwell’s is a subjective interpretation and therefore needs to be seen in that context.
Answer:
The statement that best summarizes the difference between these two ads is They have different appeals.
Explanation:
The ad from 1971 that was widely known as "The Crying Indian" was part of a campaign that has the purpose of making people aware of pollution and that they can do something to fix it, the appeal was emotional, while the campaign that they launched in 2013 add something more to it, they added a proposal so now besides being emotional it also has a sense of logic in it.
