Two Constitutions: A Comparison
ADA Text Version
US Constitution featuring the words We the PeopleIn many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.
Plataea and Mycale have great significance in ancient history as the battles that decisively ended the second Persian invasion of Greece, thereby swinging the balance of the Greco-Persian Wars in favour of the Greeks.
I would say the incident with Monica Lewinsky. That was a dub for Bush so it was a success. It also went against foreign policy.
Explanation:
The ways political machines hurt cities are People without ability or experience became officials. Option A. This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
political machines?</h3>
Generally, political machines are simply defined as the United States: a Party Organization Headed by One Person or a Small Autocratic Group That Commands Sufficient Votes to Retain Its Position as the Party's Official Opposition
In conclusion, A few of the ways in which political machinery damage urban areas include Those who lacked talent or experience and were elevated to high positions of authority.
Read more about political machines
brainly.com/question/646885?referrer
#SPJ1
Answer: your answer is C.
Explanation: insulting or villainizing someone is cruel and making it hard for them to vote would be hard in itself. You must respect they’re opinions, and they will respect yours.
