Answer:
The answer would be like this, using MLA format for in-text citations:
In order for you to know a person, you must first know his past, and especially the people, and circumstances, that shaped him/her into what he/she has become: "everything we are and all that we do can be traced back, in one way or another, to early influences..." (Monroe 35). Parents, relatives, very close and special people, and also circumstances, are the most important background information for someone to say they know anyone. In this man´s particular case, it is four main figures who become the framework, of who he is: "In my case, four figures from my childhood helped to make me who I am... my father, my mother, my grandmother, and my grandfather." (Monroe 35), because of the roles that they played in his life, and the way they impacted him: "... each giving me a gift that is unique..." (Monroe 35). And it is only through knowing about them, and how they played that role in his life that anyone can understand who he is (Monroe 35).
I would say that the answer is A. It seems like the best choice.
Answer:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
This is reading between the lines. It is taking something that you read and putting it together with something that you already know to make sense of what you read. You make an inference.
When we say we make an inference is that we are making a conclusion based on what we know or based on the evidence that is presented. For instance, if we read the telephone service contract from the new company we just read between the lines and realize that is similar to previous contracts with other companies and stop reading it because we make an inference of the content of the document.
Explanation: its inference.
now give me the thanks i need