According to a different source, this is the image that the question refers to.
In this question, we are asked to approach the question of "How justifiable was U.S. expansion in the 1800s?" from the perspective of four elements in the painting. This is an example that can help you guide your work:
The angel: "I carry the telegraph, I carry knowledge, I carry progress. You should be grateful."
The cows: "More expansion means more land, which means more farms and more cows. I think I like that!"
The Native Americans: "Quick! Let's get away before this so-called "progress" reaches us! They will continue to expand and take our land even if they have no right to do so."
The passengers in the train: "Without progress, we would not be in this train. I'm so glad we are expanding! It is necessary if we want technology to keep developing."
Although expansion was supported by a large portion of the population of the United States, not everyone believed that this was a good idea. In fact, the Native Americans, as well as many politicians, believed that expansion was not legitimate, and that it could bring more problems than anticipated.
An act or policy of expansion carried out by one state at the expense of another by means of an unprovoked military attack
Answer:
D. Partisan conflicts were part of United States history almost from the beginning.
Explanation:
The conclusion that can be drawn from the table is that "Partisan conflicts were part of United States history almost from the beginning."
The above statement is evident from the fact that in each of the issues and events, there exist conflicts between two major groups. And considering the dates of these issues and events, and it can be concluded that it occurred in the early days of the United States of America formation. Hence, option D is correct.
Option A is not correct because while the Federalists favored a strong federal government, they have plans on how to achieve it.
Option B is not correct because there is not enough information or evidence to prove that Republicans occasionally showed a willingness to compromise on states' rights.
The option C is not correct because there is nothing like Washington in the table
I think that they will have a more futuristic touch and if you have seen the movie After Earth something like that
An informal deal was struck to resolve the dispute: the Compromise of 1877, which awarded all 20 electoral votes to Hayes. In return for the Democrats' acquiescence to Hayes's election, the Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South, ending Reconstruction.
reword lol
