I believe the answer is A)
Considering what if happening in the rest of the passage, none of the others would fit so I would suggest you use process of elimination.
B) doesn’t make sense as it’s clearly saying cheating is not good
C) is just stating something that happened in the passage but isn’t the overall theme
D) is simply a statement/fact about the character and is not a theme
Therefore A is correct
Answer:
The sentence in the excerpt from Patrick Henry's famous "liberty or death" speech at the Second Virginia Convention in 1775 that emphasized the American colonists' effore to avoid war was "We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament."
I am 100% correct I took the test and got it all correct and even looked at my results to see what I put for the question. This is correct!
Explanation:
It’s unsure on what is being asked but I’m going to assume it is B
Answer:
The mother had ordered the son to carry the water into the house.
Explanation:
Mater: in the nominative case, she is the subject. If you want, you can think of her as doing the ordering.
iusserat: the third person, singular, pluperfect tense.
filium: in the accusative case, he is the direct object. If you want, you can think of him as the one receiving the action of ordering.
aquam in casam: in the accusative case, this is a use of the accusative called the accusative of place to which. You translate "in" as into.
portare: the present, active infinitive form of "porto", the infinitive is being used in a indirect statement construction, which also explains why "filium" and "aquam" are in the accusative. Indirect statements are formed with a verb of knowing, thinking, telling, or perceiving (iusserat), an accusative subject (aquam), and an infinitive (portare).
ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg