A figure of speech deviates from the ordinary, expected meanings of words to make a description or comparison unique, vivid, and memorable. Common figures of speech include metaphors, similes, and personification.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
An ancient hero refers to a person who has contributed significantly to their ethnic or religious group in some way. A traditional hero could be credited as the discoverer of fire, or farming, songs, custom, law, or religion, and is typically a people's most famous legendary figure, sometimes as the founder of their ruling dynasty.
Having crew members repeat back instructions to clarify what they have heard is one way to catch mistakes before they happen.
In our day-to-day life, we make our best decisions when we gather a lot of information. If we take the case of wildland fire fighting, we should be situationally aware to face the threat. We should know what’s going on around us—and should immediately share vital information about hazards with our supervisor and crew members in order to adopt safety measures and avoid mistakes. Situational awareness does not maintain an “off switch” when we are working near a fire.
It is somehow tempting to focus on what will be in front of us if we have got a specific task, but clarify to not forget to look up once in a while as there will be a lot going on over our head. When we look up we may encounter any number of potential hazards.
Learn to know more about crew members with the equipment or tasks they handle on
brainly.com/question/21153861
#SPJ4
Answer:
so far it's going good how about yours?
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
