1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
13

Kelley sued Champion Chevrolet as a result of a late-model used car that she purchased with the representation that it was a spe

cial-edition model driven only by the owner of the dealership. She subsequently learned that the car was, in fact, not a special edition. It had been altered to give the appearance of a special edition. Kelley was awarded $1.5 million by the jury. Champion Chevrolet retains the Scribner and Matheson law firm to represent it in the appeal. Champion Chevrolet is the appellee. True or False
Social Studies
1 answer:
Crank3 years ago
3 0
Kelley is the appellant.
False
You might be interested in
If you were a bookseller in Nashville, Tennessee, in 1860, which innovation would best help your business?
baherus [9]
The answer is railroads

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do economic decisions require individuals businesses and governments to make trade-offs?
lina2011 [118]
<span>A) using the resources needed to buy or make one good or service means not having those resources to buy or make another</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help Please! Will mark brainiest for a significant answer.
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

The Five Steps to Conflict Resolution

Explanation:

Step 1: Define the source of the conflict.

The more information you have about the cause of the problem, the more easily you can help to resolve it. To get the information you need, use a series of questions to identify the cause, like, “When did you feel upset?” “Do you see a relationship between that and this incident?” “How did this incident begin?”

Step 2: Look beyond the incident.

Often, it is not the situation but the point of view  of the situation that causes anger to fester and ultimately leads to a shouting match or other visible and disruptive result.

The source of the conflict might be a minor issue that occurred months before, but the level of stress has grown to the point where the two parties have begun attacking each other personally instead of addressing the real problem.

Step 3: Request solutions.

After getting each party’s viewpoint, the next step is to get them to identify how the situation could be changed. Again, question the parties to solicit their ideas: “How can you make things better between you?”As mediator, you have to be an active listener, aware of every verbal nuance, as well as a good reader of body language.

You want to get the disputants to stop fighting and start cooperating, and that means steering the discussion away from finger pointing and toward ways of resolving the conflict.

Step 4: Identify solutions both disputants can support.

You are listening for the most acceptable course of action. Point out the merits of various ideas, not only from each other’s perspective, but in terms of the benefits to the organization. For instance, you might suggest the need for greater cooperation and collaboration to effectively address team issues and departmental problems.Step 5: Agreement.

The mediator needs to get the two parties to shake hands and accept one of the alternatives identified in Step 4. The goal is to reach a negotiated agreement. Some mediators go as far as to write up a contract in which actions and time frames are specified. However, it might be sufficient to meet with the individuals and have them answer these questions: “What action plans will you both put in place to prevent conflicts from arising in the future?” and “What will you do if problems arise in the future?

This mediation process works between groups as well as individuals.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the name used to describe a consortium of independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the produ
grigory [225]

Answer:

Cartel

Explanation:

According to sociology, a cartel is a formal group that is formed to make price decisions on a product or service. In other words, a cartel is a organization that is created from a formal agreement between producers of a product or service with the objective of regulate their supply or manipulate the prices and therefore, limiting the competition by controlling the production, distribution and pricing of the service they do. So, a cartel is an agreement between commercial enterprises.

4 0
3 years ago
When was world war 1 begin and world war2 ended
dlinn [17]
World war 1 started July 28, 1914 and World War 2 ended on September 2, 1945
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is not a characteristic of ethnic islands?
    14·1 answer
  • Which is a benefit of having different types of producers in an ecosystem
    15·1 answer
  • What two New Deal ideas / laws were upheld by the Supreme Court in 1937 before President Roosevelt's plan for the court could be
    15·1 answer
  • under the principle of popular sovereignty the national government has three equal branches true or false
    7·1 answer
  • A manager was in the process of hiring a new employee and interviewed several candidates. After narrowing the search down to two
    15·1 answer
  • Following the financial panic in 1929, the government created the __________ in order to insure bank deposits
    12·2 answers
  • In kamala harris's speech what was the main message?
    5·2 answers
  • Is platelets necessary for our body? if so why​
    15·1 answer
  • The Columbian exchange ___________ both the New World and Old World to trade goods
    6·2 answers
  • What is legitimate government.​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!