There are two types of choices when one makes a vote:
- <u>The Rational Choice:</u> A "rational" voter is conscious that voting is a personal right that is attributed to each and every one of the citizens of a given country. It is up to that voter's criteria to discern which candidate to vote for.
- <u>The Collective Voting Choice:</u> A "collective" voter will probably tend to conform with a group he or she belongs and vote according to the choice that the group has convened to be the best. People that belong to political parties or other organizations tend to be collective voters.
Regarding the case mentioned in the question, when a voter assesses a candidate's past performance, regardless of the political affiliation of this candidate, he is engaging in a "rational" vote.
The reason the allowance paid to Senators should be based on population is that the job of a Senator is to represent his constituent.
The function of a United States Senator is many; representing their constituents is one of them.
To represent the constituent effectively, a Senator is expected to speak with the people from his states, discussing and engaging them periodically.
This often requires meeting people in different districts in his state, holding press conferences, town hall meetings, or going to the media.
Each district is based on population, and the higher the population, the higher number of districts or communities a Senator would have to meet and engage.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that giving senators allowances based on population is justified.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3066478
Intravenous sugar solutions with dextrose or glucose are generally is used for making total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
TPN is a method of feeding that bypasses the gastrointestinal tract.
D. They could pay slaveholders.