The answer is “A”.
Hope it’s help
Advantages that the English had over the French in the Battle of Agincourt are a muddy field to slow the French down, the lethal longbow, and two wood lines that protected the English.
Battle of Agincourt was a decisive war in the Hundred Years' battle that resulted in the victory of the English over the French. The English army, led by way of King Henry V, famously achieved victory despite the numerical superiority of its opponent.
The Battle of Agincourt on 25 October 1415 noticed Henry V of Britain defeat an overwhelmingly larger French navy at some stage in the Hundred-year war. The English won the way to the advanced longbow, subject position.
On top of the crowded formations, heavy armor, and lack of field, troops needed to face another obstacle; a slim battlefield. The French navy all through that time frame become no longer cut out for constricted battlefield combat; the discipline and preparedness of the English soldiers overpowered the French with extremely good ease.
Learn more about Battle of Agincourt here brainly.com/question/15166220
#SPJ4
Hello there!
Here is my OPINION/ interpretation. I may or may not be incorrect.
1). The US shouldn't sell arms (weapons) overseas because it would cause a war, and the US's goal was to stay isolated, hence the term isolationism.
Arms = weapons
Arms = body part
Selling weapons across the to Britain could cause conflicts, which could lead to war.
However, (in the first image), of they didn't sell weapons, they'd remain neutral, therefore avoiding war and its costs.
2). This cartoon MAY be trying to persuade the reader that war isn't always the solution to resolving a conflict, and that isolationism can lead to peace and unity.
Again, this is MY OPINION.
Hope this helped! :)
---------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: I am not a professional tutor or have any professional background in your subject. Please do not copy my work down, as that will only make things harder for you in the long run. Take the time to really understand this, and it'll make future problems easier. I am human, and may make mistakes, despite my best efforts. Again, I possess no professional background in your subject, so anything you do with my help will be your responsibility. Thank you for reading this, and have a wonderful day/night!
England is the answer to your problem
The term authoritarian is defined as the enforcing or favoring strict obedience to authority with the personal freedom being at expanse.
This term can be used for people that do have high authority, be it in the politics, economy, military...
Usually, something that is ruled by a person that is authoritarian ends up badly for everyone, as most of the people that are bellow that person in the hierarchy suffer, and eventually they get sick of it and take down that person.
Usually the term is used for leaders of countries in more recent times, where we have leaders that have absolute power in their countries, everyone has to obey them, and they rule with iron fist. Some examples of the near past are Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Tito, Castro, while from the present day its Kim Jong Un, Berdimuhamedow, Myint...
The authoritarians come in the form of dictator, tyrant, despot, absolutist, autocrat.