Answer:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Dont know if this helps but heres something.
A = πr²/2 = 1938.900992 * π [yd²] ≈ 4.7 [yd²]
Use this if you want to
https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/semicircle-area
Answer:
391
Step-by-step explanation:
First you must make the fraction a decimal so you can use it in an equation.
To do so move the . over to the left twice.
.68
Now multiply 575 by .68
575 x .68=391
Answer:
x = 114°
Step-by-step explanation:
The exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the 2 opposite interior angles, thus
x + 18° = 132° ( subtract 18° from both sides )
x = 114°
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is
