Answer:
1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Attached to this answer is the diagram of the box plot described in the question, and the means from the plot are calculated thus;
Students; no. of siblings
student 0 2
student 1 4
student 2 7
student 3 5
student 4 2
Total 20
Mean no. of siblings = (total number of siblings) ÷ (total number of students)
Note that number of students here are the once that had at least one sibling, others without siblings are not used in the calculation, hence 5 students (student-0 to student-4) make up total number of students, while the remaining 4 students (student-4 to student-9) are disregarded.
Therefore, mean = 20 ÷ 5 = 4 siblings.
In exponent multiplication, When the bases are the same you ADD the power so it is n^7
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Twelve point nine plus eight equals twenty point nine (12.9 + 8 = 20.9)
Hope this helped :)
Which set of ordered pairs represents y as a function of X? a{(-9, 2), (0, 6), (1, -2), (-3, 6)} b{(-1,0), (4, 3), (-7, -3), (-1
olga nikolaevna [1]
A is your answer
Explanation:
When dealing with functions, x’s never repeat.