Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
20% was, so 100%-20%=80% was not
80%=0.8
0.8*4000=3200 acres was not
Answer:
Sum of 4 and 5 → 4 + 5 = 9
Difference of 40 and 4 → 40 – 4 = 36
One-third 1/3 of 36 → 12
→ 12 – 9
» 3
Answer:
(x,y) --> (-1, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve by elimination...
2x - 3y = 7
4x + y = -7 (times 3; so -3y and 3y cancel out)
2x - 3y = 7
12x + 3y = -21
2x = 7
12x = -21
add together...
14x = -14
x = -1
plug x into one of the original equations and solve for y...
-2 - 3y =7
-3y = 9
y = -3
Answer:the answer is in the picture below
Step-by-step explanation:plz give brainlist
