Which statement best summarizes the central idea of this paragraph? She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making
a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. The spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. She did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. She had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. If the animal had died of Ebola, this was not a clear case. She opened up the intestine. There was no blood inside it. The gut looked okay. Then she examined the stomach. There she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. This could be a sign of Ebola, but it was not a clear sign. It could also be a sign of simian fever, not Ebola. Therefore, she could not confirm the presence of Ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.
The main character is examining the deceased monkey looking for a cause of death and has found multiple blood rings on it's stomach and has narrowed the cause of death down to just two causes, Simian Fever or Ebola. Hope this helps!
Hi there im alex, today my new airplane hot dug up with snow! Can you belive it i have to use a snowshoe to dig it out becouse it wont work if i dont dig it out .
The answer for your question is 1 bunch of grapes. The reason why i choose this answer is because the grapes would actually fit the people who would eating grapes.
The story supports Thoreau's idea that one can see the "reality" of things when one looks past superficial circumstances. ... for reality and the true meaning of living.
