Yes--it would have given blacks economic security and something to pass on to generations to come.
No--racism still would have existed and more than likely violence against black land owners would have been rampant.
Generations of sharecropping and dependence on land owners kept blacks economically behind and never allowed for black farm workers from advancing.
Answer:
<h3>The Senate Republicans rejected certain provisions of the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations.</h3>
Explanation:
- When President Wilson proposed for the Treaty of Versailles and an international organization which he believed would govern international relations and interactions, it was rejected by the the allied forces as well by the Senate Republicans.
- The Republican Senate leader, Henry Cobot Lodge was very skeptical about Wilson's proposal for the treaty. The Senate Republicans were against certain provisions of the treaty which they believed would hamper U.S's interest in world politics and economy.
- Lodge, therefore, proposed for certain reservations or exemptions and amendments in the provisions in the treaty which would enhance U.S's interest in the world politics.
- Wilson's failure to address Lodge's proposals in the treaty led Senate Republicans to vote against the treaty and consequently U.S failed to join the League of Nations.
No, generally speaking <span>African Americans would not have been eager to fight for the United States during the Spanish American War, since they were treated with such disrespect by white Americans, who started the war in the first place. </span>
<span>An example of an application of the Bronze Age Innovation is the planning of where to put new buildings in a place</span>