All categories

3 years ago

Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn’t the national government enforce the laws?

History

2 answers:

kotykmax [81]3 years ago

7 0

Beacuse the people thought that if they allowed to much power then they were afraid of tryanny

Maru [420]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:The states had the power to enforce the national laws.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What civilizations did the Aksum likely interact with?

LenKa [72]

Answer: Aksum was also well known to the Greeks and the Romans, and later to the Byzantines, the Arabs, and the Persians. For most of the 3rd and 4th centuries CE, it was Rome's biggest trading partner to the West.

Explanation:

Aksum developed a civilization and empire whose influence, at its height in the 4th and 5th centuries C.E., extended throughout the regions lying south of the Roman Empire, from the fringes of the Sahara in the west, across the Red Sea to the inner Arabian desert in the east. The Aksumites developed Africa’s only indigenous written script, Ge’ez. They traded with Egypt, the eastern Mediterranean and Arabia.

3 0

3 years ago

Identify the first authors source of view and supporting evidence ( begin with a verb like argues, assert, claims)

Mila [183]

Answer:

subject

English, 05.06.2020 02:01 lanakay2006

Directions: Identify the first author's source, point of view and supporting evidence. In the article

(author's name)

(begin with a verb like: argues, asserts, claims)

that

(author's last name)

supports their claim by (use a verb here such as: illustrating,

showing, rolling, explaining, demonstrating, describing)

Directions: Compare and contrast the second author's points of view and supporting evidence.

(in comparison, In contrast, On the other hand)

in the article

(second author's name)

(use a verb here such as: argues, asserts, claims, contends)

that

(second author's last name) supports their claim by (use a verb here such as: illustrating,

showing, telling, explaining, demonstrating, listing, describing)

Directions: Evaluate the claims of both authors

In evaluating these claims and their supporting evidence, I agree with

perspective because

Directions: Rewrite your paragraph here. Alternative option: Using supporting evidence from the primary

sources, choose the author you agre

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Which statement about women and African Americans during the Civil War is

frozen [14]

Answer (A)-They helped the war effort in many different ways.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Latin america extens to what border

Alborosie

Till tip of south america

5 0

3 years ago

Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w

mash [69]

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

7 0

3 years ago