1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sholpan [36]
3 years ago
7

TRUE/FALSE Was it possible to move up in social class in Ancient Egypt?

History
2 answers:
enot [183]3 years ago
6 0
Movement between social classes was almost impossible. But as the empire grew, Egypt needed more educated men to run it properly. There was a massive increase in the professional, educated classes and this enabled bright young Egyptians to move up the social ladder.

So the answer is false.
I hope this helps
quester [9]3 years ago
6 0
Was it possible to move up in a social class in ancient eqypt? Yes true.
You might be interested in
Can anyone answer this for me?
I am Lyosha [343]
I think that the answer is B
8 0
3 years ago
What is true of debates in the house of representatives
vivado [14]

"Formal Action" shall mean any vote or motion of a member of a standing committee, standing subcommittee, select committee or rules committee of the House of Representatives to report or not report, amend, consider or table a bill or resolution and the discussion and debate thereof.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Great Depression affect women?
netineya [11]

Answer:

women who could not find jobs enrolled in college

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one reason the league of nations failed?
marishachu [46]
One reason the league of nations failed was because "<span>A. It did not establish rules or structure to maintain harmony" since it was more of a general idea structure. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
World war i has often been described as an unnecessary war. do you agree? why or why not
Ne4ueva [31]
The question is based on your own opinion,I cannot give you direct answer,but here's some idea for you.

yes: the war was caused by extreme nationalism,where the nations had the desire to be strong with and they seek for national glory. It started with this concept,they began to ally,to expand,soon running into conflicts,eventually the scale enlarged to a world war. Yet the chase for national glory was originally to bring a better nation,in the end it just cause loss and destruction. War is not necessary to be started in orfer to gain national glory. Were the nations to back down,it could be avoided. You might want to expand more on the destruction it caused if you choose yes.

No: In spite of WWI did cause a lot of destruction,it pushes the history of human foward. You could talk more on the things achieved and changed in WWI,such as the fall of empires,the uprise of women rights,the establishment of national cooperation system(League of nations), and the develope of more destructive weapons.

hope it helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did farming develop between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers?
    9·1 answer
  • Political parties are
    8·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Wagner act in 1935
    8·1 answer
  • Do all markets function the same way around the world?
    7·2 answers
  • The framers of the Constitution intended to establish
    8·1 answer
  • True or False: Babylons created the 60 minute hour
    9·2 answers
  • Help please!!!
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following describes a key similarity between the traditional
    8·1 answer
  • How was engraving believed to have originated? a. By monks to document religious events b. By historians to document history c.
    12·1 answer
  • What specific role does a bill's sponsor play?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!