1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLga [1]
3 years ago
14

Guyss please help me answer these, they are so difficult:(

English
1 answer:
Arada [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1 - The cartoonist is possibly trying to convey 1 of 3 things: that people will tend to assume a situation isn't bad just because they can't see the full extent of the conflict, people would rather fill in the blanks of what they don't know with a pre existing beliefs that may or may not be true and just leave it at that, or just because whatever makes a situation bad is present in one circumstance doesn't mean it can't be harmful in another circumference.

2 - The crocodile is smiling almost mischievously, indicating that it's aware of its surroundings and the situation that its in and knows that it can act on the fact that these humans are scared of him, and frankly he looks proud as if thinking to himself "Yes fear me humans, you will respect my capabilities". Not to mention its face is shown to be as developed as the two people and is featuring human like emotions such as pride. Additionally the crocodile is on a bicycle which, as far as I know is strictly a human thing to ride.

3 - The one who's initially afraid of the croc seems to acknowledge the fact that the crocodile is an animal that shouldn't be messed with, and fears what they can do. The second who arrives after, believing that it's safe to assume that crocs are slow on land, reassures the other even though he may not know completely himself. I'd say that the first character is rational and is right to be cautious around a crocodile and the second one is more quick to believe that crocodiles can't be that bad and they should only be feared in the water.

4 - Obviously the character makes the false assumption that just because the crocodile is fast in the water, there's no evidence to conclude that the crocodile CAN'T be fast on land as well. Therefore his assumption is irrational.

5 - The cartoonist exaggerates the frame by adding a bicycle in which the crocodile sits atop. This is an exaggeration because crocodiles don't need bikes to move around, on land or in the water, and would be unnecessary for chasing them.

6 - The characters' interaction uses words to downplay the severity of the situation and make it seem as everything is alright, and the first few frames supports this. Yet we see that the crocodile is on a bike, which is quite an odd and almost hilarious site to witness, and could possibly use it to chase them but only we the audience knows this.

You might be interested in
HELP PLZ NOW
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

Information that can be acquired by examining sources are things like what happened to a person, how it happened, what this person did, etc.

Explanation:

It all kinda depends on what your talking about. You can edit what ever, but I do recommend using<em> Information that can be acquired by examining sources... </em> just add what ever you like after that    :)

<em />

3 0
4 years ago
Flattery used on julius caesar
fgiga [73]

Answer:

Decius uses flattery to lead caesar to where he will be killed. When he murder caesar, hutus use rhetoric, figures of speech, to win over

7 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from act 3 of A Doll’s House.
ipn [44]

Answer: C) Nora decides that her decisions to be a wife and raise children were wrong, so she is leaving in order to educate herself properly.

In this excerpt, Nora informs Helmer of her decision to leave him. She feels that she cannot do a good job at the tasks that have been assigned to her: being a mother and a wife. Nora argues that she is not fit to the task because she lacks proper education, and she wants to first take care of herself and educate herself. This shows that she believes her decisions to have been wrong, and she wants to leave and educate herself properly.

4 0
3 years ago
What type of word relationship does this analogy show?<br> cave:cavern::song:tune
IrinaK [193]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

Sub heading - main heading analogy

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

An analogy shows the relationship between two things at some point of similarity. The given analogy can be referred to the sub-heading-main heading analogy. In the given example, cave is a smaller section of a cavern and a song is a smaller part of a tune. Therefore, one is the bigger part and the other is the smaller part.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one example of the use of paradox in this poem? The speaker does not believe in God, but is still cheanged by Him. The s
Mice21 [21]

The speaker asks God to be violent in order to be made new

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these techniques is used in the media to inform, persuade, or entertain audiences?
    11·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt Patricia Hampl’s “The Need to Say it” and answer the question.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the denotation of the word "home"?
    6·1 answer
  • Why does Antony keep saying that Brutus is an
    13·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP ASAP I WEILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Which pair of sentences can be combined using a conjunction?
    12·1 answer
  • How does the element of body language contribute to performance? A. It helps reveal the characters’ thoughts and feelings. B. It
    12·2 answers
  • How does thatcher feel when he has to cross the bridge
    11·1 answer
  • I need help. Thanks!
    11·1 answer
  • Intro-What it takes to be a good friend?
    9·2 answers
  • Two styles for documentation of your sources are
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!