Answer:
Maoist terrorism is a type of revolutionary terrorism since its objective is not to inflict terror on a certain group, but to generate a change in the established political order of the territory in which it operates, with the ultimate aim of establishing a Maoist-oriented communist government there, that is, based on the ideologies of Mao Zedong.
Therefore, the use of terrorist-type tools only aims at the establishment of a political revolution and an eventual change of government, and not at the defense of a specific ideology or religion.
Answer:
Options: She told the president what the people were thinking.
She checked up on government projects.
She became a champion for underdogs.
She wrote books, and for newspapers and magazines.
She held press conferences.
Explanation:
As Franklin Roosevelt entered into politics, Eleanor Roosevelt started helping her husband as a helpmate. Became active to keep his interest in politics alive. She dedicated her life to him and became a trusted reporter. She never avoided formal entertaining. Press conferences conducted, and she travelled across America and, gives lectures and radio broadcasts.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the Articles gave the federal government practically no power over the states, meaning that they could not tax and raise revenue.</span></span>
Answer: Deportation, known as “removal” under federal immigration law, is the process of removing a person who is not a U.S. citizen from the country, often by transporting him or her to his or her country of origin.
Explanation:
<span>Madison claimed that private rights and public good would be best protected in a single large republic rather than a mélange of small republics. Do I agree? Yes, absolutely, I agree. There's no strength in division; it is pretty obvious that in unity is strength. Just think for a seconds what will become of the United States if there are 52 countries in North America? India would be more developed had Pakistan and Bangladesh not broken off from India. Yes, public good should be protected in a large republic rather than a string of small republics.</span>