The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case was monumental in America, as it stated that slaves had no rights which their owners were bound to respect. Along with this, it also stated that slaves are property and can be brought into free states.
This case causes significant divide between the nation. The southern states and those individuals with slaves see this as a victory, as they can now take their slaves wherever they want without the fear of these individuals becoming free men. On the other hand, abolitionists and states who outlawed slavery are furious. This is because they now have to allow slave owners to keep their slaves in a state where they do not want slavery. This case resulted in a bigger divide between those for slavery and those against slavery.
An example of legislation being used to liberate lgbtq+ civil rights, is that in some countries, having prejudice or discriminatory actions towards people part of the lgbtq+ community is illegal, and you could be imprisoned for it. On the contrary, an example of legislation used to discriminate lgbtq+ members, is that in other countries, police tear gas and harm people who protest for the rights to be lgbtq+.
The correct answer is 10%.
Sometimes these numbers were higher, sometimes they were lower, but in general, good economic years hovered around 10% which was not so bad for the society since it's impossible to reduce it to 0% and it is also easy for it to go way over 10%, so the 10% mark was acceptable for numerous countries in Europe.
According to this quotation, President Kennedy wanted to "(1) assert United States leadership in world <span>affairs" as he evokes somewhat of a moral responsibility. </span>
