Please explain to me what exactly the question is. You can't answer something if there is no question.
Answer:
There is no sufficient evidence to reject the company's claim at the significance level of 0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Let 
be the true mean weight per apple the company ship. We want to test the next hypothesis
vs 
(two-tailed test).
Because we have a large sample of size n = 49 apples randomly selected from a shipment, the test statistic is given by
which is normally distributed. The observed value is
. The rejection region for 
is given by RR = {z| z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where the area below -1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025; and the area above 1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025 as well. Because the observed value 1.4583 does not fall inside the rejection region RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Applying the rules, it is found that ordered pair (24,6), option A, works for both rules.
---------------------
The rule 1 is that y is x divided by 4, that is:
The rule 2 is that y is x subtracted from 18, that is:
In item A, we have that the input x = 24, thus, the results of the expressions are:
In both cases, ordered pair (24,6), thus <u>option A is the answer.</u>
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/22103476
Answer 15m + 11n
Step-by-step explanation: 12+3=15 =15m + 4+7=11 = 11n = 15m + 11n
Answer: (12+3x)x
Explanation: When you distribute the x in the first option you'll get 12x+3x, which you can simplify to 15x (combine like-terms). Having this information, you know that the first one is equivalent to the third one and the fourth option. When you distribute the x in the second you you get (3x^2)+12x. This is not equal to any other option.
