Answer:
the standard of living increased
Explanation:
Between the years 1948 and 1990, the level of productivity in the United States of America increased tremendously, to the extent that it was in the doubled fold. Consequently, this increase in the level of productivity simply exemplified that, there is a substantial increase in the standard of living for the average American.
Hence, it can be concluded that, in this case, the workweek didn't get shorter because "the standard of living increased."
Answer:
Given:
12% bonds have a face value of $35,000,000
Bonds sold for $37,702,483 based on the market interest rate of 10%.
∴
The interest expense on July 1 can be computed as
Interest expense = Bonds sold × Effective market interest rate (
= 5%)
= $37,702,483 × .05 (1/2 of the effective interest rate)
= $1,885,124
⇒ The interest expense on July 1 is $1,885,124
Answer:
<h2>
C. A way of increasing the efficiency of ticket distribution </h2>
Explanation:
Ticket Scalpers are the ticket speculators who buy the tickets to a sport or performance event and resells them at higher prices. Lassiez-faire economists consider it to be a good thing. the correct value of the ticker is decided by the market but the Scalpers are flexible in pricing than the venue, they may also bear a loss while still guaranteeing the full value that venue gets. But the problem with the scalping is the at the value goes to the <u><em>agents</em></u> instead of the venue that is providing the product.
Answer:
GDP to increase
Explanation:
Gross domestic product (GDP) refers to the total value of goods and services produced within the boundaries of a nation. Its component are consumption, investment, government expenditure and net exports.
GDP = Y = Consumption + Investment + Government expenditure + Net exports
Net exports refers to the difference of total value of exports and total value of imports.
Net exports = Exports - Imports
Therefore, if there is an increase in the net exports then as a result the GDP of a nation increases.
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
