Answer:
a. Reformation
Explanation:
In the given instance, it is clearly observed that the Vehicle Identification Number is not correctly written in the contract, and that happened due to typing errors, and was not intentional.
In these cases the courts order to reform the contract, and then the reformed contract shall reflect the intentions of both the parties as what they intend.
In the given case also, reformation will take place as the error is not due to intentionally, fraud with the other party. Thus correct option is:
a. Reformation
Cheaper pricing, more attractive loyalty programmes, more convenient delivery options and better product range.
Explanation:
A website asked participants how much their average spending online is invested. Results suggest Amazon Prime subscribers buy more money overall; U.S. Prime affirms doing 53 percent of their online shopping, while Non-Prime members invest 50 percent in the United Kingdom.
As internet customers in general, they spoke to Prime members about Amazon being too strong, with 61% of British members and 69% of American Prime members claiming that they are worried with Amazon's increasing and stifling competition. Amazon is a big player.
The main reasons they asked for Amazon were: lower prices, more loyalty rewards, more flexible shipping choices and better product selection.
Prime Members quoted the main reasons they should choose another store over Amazon. In the United States 26% and in the United Kingdom 18% have reported that they enjoy interactions in-store.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The question asks to calculate how much will be disbursed by the company in February.
Firstly , we know that the company disburses 75% in the month of purchase and 25% during the month after purchase.
Now, 75% of $130,000 would be disbursed as February’s own payment:
Mathematically 75/100 * 130,000 = 97,500
Also, we should not forget that the company disburses 25% of previous month during the current. That is 25/100 * 100,000 = 25,000
Total amount disbursed is thus 25,000 + 97,500 = $122,500
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
The construction company is entitled to compensation because it has a property right to enter and remove minerals.
The investor gave the construction company the right to use the properties on the land, if anything would be done on the land, the construction company should be compensated because they bought the right to do business there. Since the owner granted them the sole right, they are entitled to the resources.
