Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm sure he was making a joke at the expense of people who rely on mathematics rather than common sense. It is funny, but then Twain was a remarkably funny author..
The problem is that the comparison is apt using some sort of proportion, but it is absurd to think that the land holding the river would also shrink a proportional amount.
The river reached a minimum (presumably) in 1875 by cutting out all the loops that were there in 1700. The Mississippi was then a straight line from it's beginning to its delta on the gulf of Mexico. It could not get any shorter. Still, Twain managed to get laughs with his whimsical humor.
Thanks for posting. This made my evening.
The answer is b. Hope this helps!!
Answer:
H0 : p ≤ 0.75 against Ha : p > 0.75
Step-by-step explanation:
We formulate our null and alter native hypotheses as
H0 : p ≤ 0.75 against Ha : p > 0.75
In the question the claim whether the promotional campaign actually increased the proportion of tourists visiting the museum is given which is formulated as alternative hypothesis.
So when we formulate the alternative hypothesis as Ha : p> 0.75 the null hypothesis is H0 p ≤ 0.75
Where p is the probability = 75% = 75/100 = 0.75
Answer
This is the slope-intercept form.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
3x²+2x+4
Step-by-step explanation:
using the foil distributive method
