Answer: 110%
Explanation:
The effective rate of protection is used in measuring the final tariff in a particular sector and it's expressed as:
g = (t -ai,ti) / (1 - ai)
where,
g = effective protection rate
ai = nominal tariff rate = 0.6
t = cost of intermediate input = 0.5
ti = nominal tariff on intermediate input = 0.1
The computer price here is $800 while the input price is 60% of $800 which will be:
= 60% × $800 = $480
nominal tariff rate = 480/800 = 0.6
Nominal tariff on final goods, t = 50% = 0.5
Tariff on imported input, ti = 10% = 0.1
Using the formula:
g = (t -ai,ti) / (1 - ai)
g = [0.5 - (0.6×0.1)] / (1 - 0.6)
g = (0.5 - 0.06) / 0.4
g = 0.44/.0.4
g = 1.10
g = 110%
The effective rate of protection is 110%
Answer:
The answer to this question is E. $25,258.
Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.