Answer:
Instruction documents, such as user manuals, and business proposals.
Explanation:
Technical writing refers to <u>a type of writing that is generally used in specific 'technical' fields</u>, such as engineering, informatics, finance, biotechnology, among others.
Writing a technical document requires extensive knowledge of the area and of the technicisms because it aims to inform and explain complex information. For example, instruction documents or user manuals <u>usually contain a large amount of complex data that could be understood and comprehended by people who are familiar with the terms</u>. Also, business proposals tend to <u>contain technicisms that are only used in a specific area, such as specific softwares or technology used by a biotechnology company.</u>
<span> These errors occur because the logician leaves out necessary material in an argument or misdirects others from missing information.</span>
I'm pretty sure this is the answer
Answer:
It establishes the lack of connection between Akakiy and his colleagues.
"The tension between freedom and responsibility” best developed in this passage is Golding uses description to emphasize the boys’ actions. Thus, option "A" is correct.
<h3>What is the Central idea of the Newsela article?</h3>
It reveals without considering the structure. here the man should be an evil savage beast.
It should be free from the constraints with respect to society, and people should be drawn away. here the human being should be saved by the nature and it should be moved by urges.
Thus, option "A" is correct.
Learn more about humans here:
brainly.com/question/24509056
#SPJ1
This is a short modernist fiction that celebrates the life of the imagination, and points to its shortcomings. As a narrator, Woolf was in the habit of thinking aloud and talking to herself, as well as to her imaginary readers. Here she takes the process one stage further by ‘talking’ to her own fictional creations.
She also shows the process of the artistic imagination at work, raising doubts about its own creations, asking questions, and posing alternative interpretations. She even develops lines of narrative then backtracks on them as improbable or cancels them as invalid, mistaken interpretation, or rejects them as inadequate.
In other words, the very erratic process of ratiocination – all the uncertainties, mistakes, hesitations – are reproduced as part of her narrative. She even addresses her own subject, silently, from within the fictional frame, and reflects on fictional creations which ‘die’ because they are rejected as unacceptable:
