Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Isn’t that the most simplified answer? is there an equals sign on the equation
Answer:
improving upon a previous attempt at creating a new union.
Explanation:
improving upon a previous attempt at creating a new union.
duplicating the original government system set up by the union.
creating a union with stronger ties between individual states.
building up the union with help of foreign governments.
got it correct on test
He refused to be commander of the Paris garrison. It was an offered to him by Robespierre but
he decline the offer because he felt there was danger to accepting it. Rather he
took a secret mission to Genoa and when he came back, Robespierre was eliminated
and he was arrested but released on the grounds of lack of evidence.
Answer:
B) taxes and fees
Explanation:
Funding for the operation of the state government comes primarily from local property taxes.
