Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
His claim was If he couldn’t have freedom then he would rather be dead
He stated many times in his speech about how he wanted fight for freedom and he wanted others to join him in the battle between the British and the 13 colonies
Hope this helps
Answer:
Beware all who enter here.
Explanation:
This is easy, so take a look at the third symbol. It corresponds with the "w" which is a right facing arrow and a dot inside of it.
Answer:
Yes, a complete sentence is something that has a beginning and an end with a period, so it doesn't really matter how long or short it is.
Explanation:
"I have a really good day."
"This is a sentence."
