Let's use the process of elimination to find the answers to this question. It is not option A because then that would be a autobiography which is when the person writes about their life story, it also wouldn't be option B because then that would be invalid information when a biography is written about someone else's life so writing false information about someone's life for a biography isn't a good thing. The final incorrect option would have to be option E because you can write a biography about a fictional character if the author so wishes. Which means the answers are options C, and D or "has accurate time and places, and a combination of true and imaginary characters."
This would depend on which side you are on, so if you are on the side allowing students to text at school, you can say it opens resources for students as well as a source of communication. However, personally I think that the argument that students shouldn't text would be easier because it has more evidence. You can say students can cheat, they can get distracted which will lead to bad grades etc
“the cost of public transportation at the current rate can really add up for a person who travels to work everyday” since the claim mentions work and payment, work and payment should be mentioned in the counterclaim as well
