I would Side with the federalists because with out that happening today we wouldn't have a strong government, the whole reason for federalist was to make the government stronger, and to oppose that sounds not so smart to me.
Hammurabi lived between 1792 and 1750.
Russia became "communist" (actually more like a dictatorship) because the autocratic government of the Tsarist regime failed to provide food to its people and insisted on fighting World War I. Then the democratic Provisional Government. Which was put in place when the Tsar abdicated in March 1917, also failed to end. the war and the food shortages. When the Provisional Government lost the support.Of the Russian people, Lenin and his Bolshevik supporters simply staged a couple.which eliminated the Provisional Government and gave power to the many workers. councils called Soviets in the larger cities. The people supported the Bolshevik.takeover at least temporarily because Lenin got Russia out of the war,redistributed land to the peasants and curtailed the food shortages. Lenin and.the Bolsheviks were Marxist and intended to adopt a socialist system and eventually to become a communist country. True Marxian communism was never i<span>nstituted in Russia.
</span>
hope that helped
Answer:
The states for ratification.
The answer to the question being stated above is definitely the last option.
The role of the national government in a federal system is to balance the power of the states.
><span>A federal system is a type of government whose powers are divided between the federal (national) government and local governments.</span>