Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
1. look over it quickly to get a sense of its contents.
A.) Miep and Mr.Kraler
Mr. and Mrs. VanDaan joined Anne Frank and her family while they are in hiding. Therefore, they could not have protected them and brought them food since they are hiding too. Margot is Anne's sister so she was also in hiding. This leaves the only option as option A, Miep and Mr. Kraler. They were people that Mr. Frank trusted with their secret. Miep and Bep actually found Anne Frank's diary and kept them safe.
The answer would be Suspenseful.
Credits to them ↓
option c would be considered an evidence