The answer to the question is C.
to emphasize the idea that all Americans were treated as equals prior to the attack
to reveal the extent of the impact resulting from the attack on Pearl Harbor
Explanation:
Originalism prevents judges from gaining unfettered discretion to inject their personal values into a written constitution.
Originalism helps ensure predictability and protects against arbitrary changes in the interpreted meaning of a constitution; to reject originalism inplicitly repudiates stare decisis.
If the Constitution as interpreted can truly be changed at the decree of a judge, then "The Constitution ... is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please."
Exchanging of goods without face to face is called virtual teams.
It would be the term "monopoly" that <span>refers to an economic situation where only one company makes a product and is therefore able to fix the selling price, which is why such firms are often illegal in the United States. </span>