Answer:
Because an uneducated population would be easier to manipulate.
Explanation:
Radio Mullah is an Islamic extremist featured in the book "I am Malala." In this book, we can see how he made the population believe that reading books, watching movies, dancing and even going to school were sinful things and would bring God's punishment in people's lives. Of all the things that Radio Mullah claimed were sinful, education was something he strove to fight, going so far as to bomb schools. The need to prevent people from studying existed because Radio Mullah needed the population to be easily manipulated and this would not be possible if people had education, as education promotes reasoning and right thinking, which prevents people from being manipulated.
Importantly, "I am Malala" is the book written by Malala Yousafzai, where she tells of the Taliban domination process in Afghanistan and how she fought to guarantee the right to education.
Some positive effects are: it enhances learning skills and recognize emotions; and the negative effects are it leads to violence, behave aggressively and lastly, it leads to emotional problems. These effects include obesity, language delays, and learning disabilities. Physical inactivity while viewing TV reduces necessary exercise and leads to over-eating. Language delays occur when a child doesn't interact with others. Children learn language best from live interaction with parents or other individuals.
Im pretty sure the answer is archaic
When a group is faced with common adversity, working together is better than being divided.
Explanation:
The Lost Message is a perfect example of the case when a group is faced with a humongous danger and the members of the group have different opinions of tackling them. Disunity and rivalry at that time can cost dear as signified in the above-stated lore.
The failure of the ants to arrive at a common decision regarding dealing with the adversity led them to their destruction. These stories have hidden meanings which need to understood and inculcated in our day to day dealings.
Hi there!
In English, many short stories contain a lesson of how taking a stand is what matters, and not winning. Usually the protagonist of the story takes the stand while the antago wins (this isn’t every story, but many). Here are a few examples that might make winning count more . . .
- You won’t get desired attention for making an accomplishment if you win compared to just “standing up for what is right.”
- One might have an overall different mindset of not caring about certain policies or rules
- The team doesn’t want to be let down
These are just a few examples that are very general and not based on a certain story, but could apply to some. If you need to apply this to a certain story or novel, take into consideration the theme and analysis of it, and think about what the character’s mindsets are. This process should also help you grasp on how the question can be answered.
I hope this helps!
<em>~ Have an amazing day ~</em>
