The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Answer:
what story are you talking about?
Answer:
I would start by showing the room looking all dusty. I would have curtains that are hanging and torn, and I would make the room look like a mess, with the light dimming. Then, I would change to show the same furniture, only new, fresh curtains in the same fabric, and brighter light to show that it is morning.
Explanation:
This is the sample response.
Answer:
Explanation:
Comment
Choose one that has a topic sentence and sentences that contain ideas that support the topic sentence. That's being focused.
The answer could only be A
