1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Over [174]
3 years ago
9

Peyton has a hard time studying because it can be

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
7 0
He can choose an area with more light.
oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is D (He can choose an area with more light).
You might be interested in
Why is friendship an important component of Holi?
klasskru [66]
Http://www.holifestival.org/significance-of-holi.html
8 0
3 years ago
Which organism is likely to carry out the process shown in the diagram?
Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

D. Callalily

Explanation:

Because its a plant

4 0
3 years ago
How did European establishment of trading posts in Asia and Africa affect politics in these regions (1450-1750)?
Natalija [7]

European establishment of trading posts in Asia and Africa affect politics in these regions (1450-1750) in that the establishment of new trading-post empires by the Europeans in Africa and Asia was advantageous for the kings and traders who participated in the emerging global trade networks, but these empires also had an impact on the strength of the governments in interior West and Central Africa.

<h3>What was the effect of the trading post about?</h3>

While other foods were introduced to the Americas by African slaves, Europeans brought fruit trees, wheat, sugar, and domesticated animals (horses, cattle, and pigs okra, rice)

The introduction of European agriculture and settlement methods to the Americas during the period of European colonization frequently resulted in soil depletion and deforestation, which had an impact on the physical environment. Funding for the visual and performing arts, even for popular audiences, surged along with an increase in literacy and an increased emphasis on innovation and scientific investigation as merchant profits rose and governments raked in more taxes.

Slavery in Africa kept on the practice of both exporting slaves to the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean in addition to continuing the customary practice of integrating mostly female slaves into families.

Therefore, Royally incorporated European monopoly firms and the flow of silver from the Spanish colonies in the Americas to buy Asian items for the Atlantic markets helped to promote the new global circulation of goods. Regional markets kept expanding thanks to established business methods and fresh, transoceanic shipping services created by European merchants.

Learn more about trading posts from

brainly.com/question/734568
#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
In the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, a wide variety of resistance movements across Asia and Africa fought against Europe
frutty [35]

Answer:

India's independence movement and revolts in Sudan.

Explanation:

These two campaigns are fought in all factors. The riots in Sudan were triggered by religion and brought out by violent processes. France had authority in Sudan, and the organizers of the faith-sponsored campaign attempted to overcome French rule. On the other hand, the old Indian freedom movement was not on a violent pathway. Civil disobedience, nonviolent protests were the main techniques of resistance. India's independence campaign is promoted by ethnicity and nationalism. So one campaign used violent and militant ways, while the other campaign used revolution and patriotism.

8 0
3 years ago
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Someone please help me
    12·2 answers
  • TIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that
    7·2 answers
  • What do virtually all “phishing” emails have in common?
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose you inflate your tires to 36 psi on a 22 degrees Celsius day. Later the temperature drops to 0 degrees celsuis. what is
    7·2 answers
  • PICTURE CONTEST. ADD AN PICTURE. ANY PICTURE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. think of a picture and answer as it
    15·1 answer
  • 7) This is an area in which an organism lives and that will provide the organism with the resources it needs to survive.
    15·1 answer
  • Emily and her husband are thrilled as they peer into Emily's uterus by means of an ultrasound. The physician reports that the pr
    6·1 answer
  • Which point on the Production Possibilities Curve (PPC) is considered INEFFICIENT or
    6·1 answer
  • I need this answered right away, please!!
    6·2 answers
  • The graph above, the increasing marginal returns
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!