Answer:
<em><u>1.a</u></em>
Explanation:
<em><u>please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mark</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>me</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>as</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>brainleist</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
If you use a mixture of formats in a single document, it can be confusing to the reader. This is the exact opposite of what formatting is supposed to do.
Answer: c. Each line of the document has different formatting applied to it.
The situation described is an example of classical conditioning because a stimulus (Scut Farkas laughs) causes a specific reaction (fear in the other characters)
<h3>What is classical conditioning?</h3>
Classical conditioning is a scientific theory that focused on the study of a type of associative learning developed by Ivan Pávlov.
Classical conditioning posits that an external stimulus can generate a specific response in an individual or group depending on whether it has associated both factors, for example:
- A dog makes a response (in this case, salivation) to a stimulus (the bell indicating food). The next time he heard the bell, regardless of whether it was attached to the food, he would begin to salivate.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that the situation described is an example of classical conditioning because the characters associate Scut Farkas' laughter with a feeling of fear.
Learn more about classical conditioning in: brainly.com/question/17583598
THE ANSWER IS BECAUSE OF BANKS TREATS APPROACH AND examples being used such as
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'm not in Ap but it was a easy enough
