Answer:
True.
Explanation:
When independent clauses are joined incorrectly (with improper punctuation or conjunction), we have what is called a run-on sentence. An independent clause is a group of words that can stay alone as a sentence, which means it offers information that makes sense without the help of another sentence.
A sentence fragment is basically an incomplete sentence. That means it is a phrase that is missing a key element, such as a verb or a subject, or a phrase that is dependent on a main clause but has been detached from it through wrong punctuation.
The sentence "After falling to the warm, damp forest floor, plants decay and release nutrients" is complete, and the punctuation is used appropriately. It might look confusing at first since the main clause came after the subordinate one. If we invert the clauses, we'll see there is no problem with the sentence - note that a comma will disappear now that the main clause comes first:
Plants decay and release nutrients after falling to the warm, damp forest floor.
Answer:
1. am watching
2. is not listening
3. are sitting
Explanation:
All of those above is at present continuous tense.
Answer:
If you write an essay about your favourite television show, you probably want to <em>inform</em> your audience what you consider is so good about it and <em>why you think it is important for others to watch it.</em>
Explanation:
If you think the best format to express why you think that show is the best show on tv, you probably think that you need to give precise information and data in order to be clear for your audience, otherwise, you would just write a short article or you would tweet about it. But, you think the essay is the best way because you think of it as a deep subject, you have reasons, you have information and you want everyone to know how this show is so great and why they should watch it too.
Answer:
Yes I have persevered in order to achieve a goal. When I was bad at tennis, I played for 6 hours every day for 3 months and now I am a nationally recognized player. I have witnessed my friends persevere and practice before they go to a competition. I have given up on inventing a product, but instead I sold my idea for $150,000.
Explanation:
I appreciate a capitalist system which allows the market to compete unencumbered, with few restraints. However, when individuals or organizations are able to dictate with life-threatening decisions based on money and not humanity, then I call for a revolt. The pleasures of love and life, a marriage bound by sacred vows, surely these things possess a value which far outweigh the interests of someone who is unwilling to part with their commodity. If there is no room for compromise from the pharmaceutical industry for delayed payments or payments with interest over time, then I say steal the drug.
