Answer: the correct answer is D. Novelty/predictability.
Explanation:
Relational dialectics is an interpersonal communication theory about close personal bonds and relationships that highlights the issues, struggles and interplay between contrary tendencies. This theory, proposed respectively by Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery in 1988, defines communication frameworks between relationship partners as the result of never ending dialectical tensions. The dialect is, in this case, novelty/predictability since Shelly has taken a novel action and Lincoln is predictable in the sense that he is schedule-oriented.
Answer:
Kosslyn's experiment found that the brain activity in the visual cortex:
<u>Plays a causal role in both perception and imagery.</u>
Explanation:
The investigation over the visual cortex done by Kossy, discovered that mental imaginary would activate the area of the visual cortex. This is so important because it proves that the brain, specifically this part, can operate without the real visual stimuli.
In other words the experiment proved that the visual cortex is not exclusivly activated when visual stimuli is present. This part of the brain can be activated by mental representation of for instance and object.
This experiment is important for the understangin of perception and memory.
Answer:
When you become a adult things change, Y o u r l if e c h a n g e s t o o its hard for kids to focus on what matters when there older.
Hope this helps
Explanation:
Answer: Concepts
Explanation:
It is a mental grouping of similar things, events, and people that is used to remember and understand what things are, what they mean, and what categories or groups they belong to. For example, if I say to you, "think of a car," the concept, "car" will evoke some ideas in your head about what a car is and what types of characteristics it contains
Answer:
No they don't, he regularly alludes to them as "uncouth" and requests that they be removed from their general public.
Explanation:
Morals and style topple over in favor of relativism in Virginia. "Countries raised to freedom and to decision themselves consider some other type of government colossal and in spite of nature. Those familiar with government do likewise". Montaigne relates the reality without condemning it: his long experience has instructed him that all judgment is nevertheless the declaration of propensity; thusly, nothing licenses him to assert that freedom is a decent, and its nonattendance a shrewdness; to esteem freedom would be confirmation of ethnocentrism, and to mask propensity as all inclusive reason. This would be significantly more apparent with regards to judgments about excellence: who couldn't refer to a few precedents outlining the insecurity of the human perfect? "It is likely that we know minimal about what excellence is in nature and by and large, since to our own human magnificence we give such a large number of various structures".
